TravsSonic
New member
while we were discussing engine break in, the mention of clutch break in was skimed over. I was asked to make a thread about this, sooooo here is what i've learned about the OEM clutch assembly for the 1.4. This does not apply to the 1.8 as they have a different flywheel and PP, so i have no working knowledge of that assembly. But we can assume its also manufactured by LuK just as the 1.4's is.
Normally, you do a couple hundred miles of in town driving on a clutch assembly before you ever go WOT. All the starting and stopping allows the clutch to slip slightly every time you take off as well as shift gears. This lets both sides of the discs get all scuffed up and seated well to the flywheel and PP.
This clutch disc had 5500 miles on it when it was removed from the car because it simply would not hold the engine in WOT acceleration.
Thats all that was contacting the flywheel and pressure plate. And thats the only surface area on the discs holding the power transmission from the engine to the gearbox. If an area isn't scuffed, its not contacting, if its not contacting its not helping. You can see on the one picture that the part number is completely visible after 5.5k miles which means none of that area was touching while the clutch was engaged.
Possible reasons...
1) weak/poorly designed PP
2) clutch disc material to hard with to low CoF (Coefficient of Friction)
I personally am swaying heavily towards the weak/poorly designed PP. There is also other issues with this assembly that swing me towards that thought process. The main issue is the grinding of 1st-->2nd shifts above 5k rpm, i'm guessing this PP, while its weak when engaged, its experiencing some issues like some diaphragm clutches at high RPMs and its slightly breaking over at high RPMs while tryin to disengage it. Its not enough to keep itself fully engaged but its enough that its making 1st to 2nd shifts unfriendly and destructive to brass syncros. Since its the syncros job to slow down the assembly, and line up the dogs to drop into place. But if the PP is slightly dragging in a break over then the syncros can't accommodate for the extra load and you get gear grind or completely locked out. The tall gearing between 1st and 2nd exaggerate this issue, which is why it doesn't show in any other gear changes.
This is a VERY well known issue in the cruze forums. One members shop actually received a notice back from GM that they were not to replace the gentleman's syncros as it was a known problem and they are not addressing it atm. That they are to wait till the transmission completely fails from this issue. Then just replace it.
IMO, the issue though is NOT with the transmission. Because I also had this gear grind in my car at 5k+ 1st to 2nd shifts. When i moved to a twin disc assembly the problem and grinding instantly went away. So in my opinion.. this all falls back on the PP. Its simply an over engineered piece of junk. A properly designed PP that works as its suppose to should cure these issues.
just my long winded $0.02
I've also email LuK with the links to my photobucket page with pics of the clutch failure. They haven't responded as of yet.
Ok. As a dumb dumb, could you explain what I'm looking at here? Why do you think it's not fully engaging? design issue?
We should probably take this over to your clutch thread..
Normally, you do a couple hundred miles of in town driving on a clutch assembly before you ever go WOT. All the starting and stopping allows the clutch to slip slightly every time you take off as well as shift gears. This lets both sides of the discs get all scuffed up and seated well to the flywheel and PP.
This clutch disc had 5500 miles on it when it was removed from the car because it simply would not hold the engine in WOT acceleration.







Thats all that was contacting the flywheel and pressure plate. And thats the only surface area on the discs holding the power transmission from the engine to the gearbox. If an area isn't scuffed, its not contacting, if its not contacting its not helping. You can see on the one picture that the part number is completely visible after 5.5k miles which means none of that area was touching while the clutch was engaged.
Possible reasons...
1) weak/poorly designed PP
2) clutch disc material to hard with to low CoF (Coefficient of Friction)
I personally am swaying heavily towards the weak/poorly designed PP. There is also other issues with this assembly that swing me towards that thought process. The main issue is the grinding of 1st-->2nd shifts above 5k rpm, i'm guessing this PP, while its weak when engaged, its experiencing some issues like some diaphragm clutches at high RPMs and its slightly breaking over at high RPMs while tryin to disengage it. Its not enough to keep itself fully engaged but its enough that its making 1st to 2nd shifts unfriendly and destructive to brass syncros. Since its the syncros job to slow down the assembly, and line up the dogs to drop into place. But if the PP is slightly dragging in a break over then the syncros can't accommodate for the extra load and you get gear grind or completely locked out. The tall gearing between 1st and 2nd exaggerate this issue, which is why it doesn't show in any other gear changes.
This is a VERY well known issue in the cruze forums. One members shop actually received a notice back from GM that they were not to replace the gentleman's syncros as it was a known problem and they are not addressing it atm. That they are to wait till the transmission completely fails from this issue. Then just replace it.
IMO, the issue though is NOT with the transmission. Because I also had this gear grind in my car at 5k+ 1st to 2nd shifts. When i moved to a twin disc assembly the problem and grinding instantly went away. So in my opinion.. this all falls back on the PP. Its simply an over engineered piece of junk. A properly designed PP that works as its suppose to should cure these issues.
just my long winded $0.02
I've also email LuK with the links to my photobucket page with pics of the clutch failure. They haven't responded as of yet.