bluejay, you raise a lot of points. Let's see...
1) If Donald Trump had nothing to hide he would have disclosed his tax returns long ago. Hillary Clinton has disclosed her tax returns for many years. IRS audit is a very lame excuse. Every other candidate in recent memory has disclosed his tax return. He doesn't get a free ride.
2) Hillary speeches to Wall Street, ... I am not sure what this all about. As a private person she can give speeches to whomever and get paid whatever someone is willing to pay. Now as for what was said, I am not sure what difference it would make. Does anyone think she would make shady promises? If she was stupid enough to do that some attendee would have blabbed it to Fox News long ago and got paid handsomely.
3) Wall Street owns Hillary? Well that makes as much sense as the rumors going around now that Trump doesn't want his taxes disclosed because he is owned by Putin. Hillary and her husband are quite wealthy as it is. I don't think she'd sell her soul to Wall Street. As for Donald Trump, I fear he doesn't have a soul ... or even a Kia Soul.
4) Any reference to the Bill Clinton presidency should also include his many successes; he was popular when he left office for good reason. Now as for his successor, ... how quick we are to forget how life was under the last Republican administration.
5) Private e-mail system, here I agree with you. She was arrogant and stupid to go with such a system despite advice to the contrary. No excuse. However it seems people forget her predecessors had similar systems that no one wanted to investigate. So instead millions are spent investigating something that was far from criminal but rather an exercise in poor judgement. I might also mention millions of e-mails were deleted, or more charitably "disappeared", from an e-mail server during the Bush years.
6) Benghazi. Well at least spending a fortune on several investigations showed that Clinton acted appropriately. Just a crazy witch hunt, IMHO. And I might remind you far more people were killed in numerous embassy incidents during the Bush years. Oh, and a 200+ marines were killed in Beirut during the Reagan years. I don't seem to recall any exhaustive congressional hearings or witch hunts following those episodes.
7) Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Well I am not one to praise Debbie. I think she is a shrill, overly partisan harpy (a Democratic equivalent of Michelle Bachman with a few more brain cells). But Hillary did not appoint Debbie to the job. No evidence Hillary colluded with Debbie to undermine Bernie Sanders. Yet do I think Debbie would have done something underhanded to shaft Bernie? Quite possibly. But Hillary won fair and square. She garnered far more votes that Bernie, even to the point of not needing super delegates (..I think this super delegate business is awful).
IMHO, Hillary is a very smart woman. She fully grasps the role of POTUS and is fully qualified for the job. Do I *trust* her personally? Meh. But I do think ultimately we'll have an Obama third term. For me this is good enough considering the alternative ...
... and that alternative is a person who is utterly unqualified to be Commander in Chief. On a personal level I find him FAR more repulsive that Hillary; he's just creepy. His views on women, disabled individuals, and minorities are, IMHO, not consistent for those who should be considered as POTUS. Even George W. Bush, whom I think was a dreadful president, had far better character than Trump.
Sorry for going on. I am not going to post further here; I don't think my words will convince any Trump supporter to changes his/her ways. I also find these sorts of exchanges lead to "too much heat and not enough light". I hope what I wrote is viewed more illuminating than incendiary.
_Lazza
1) If Donald Trump had nothing to hide he would have disclosed his tax returns long ago. Hillary Clinton has disclosed her tax returns for many years. IRS audit is a very lame excuse. Every other candidate in recent memory has disclosed his tax return. He doesn't get a free ride.
2) Hillary speeches to Wall Street, ... I am not sure what this all about. As a private person she can give speeches to whomever and get paid whatever someone is willing to pay. Now as for what was said, I am not sure what difference it would make. Does anyone think she would make shady promises? If she was stupid enough to do that some attendee would have blabbed it to Fox News long ago and got paid handsomely.
3) Wall Street owns Hillary? Well that makes as much sense as the rumors going around now that Trump doesn't want his taxes disclosed because he is owned by Putin. Hillary and her husband are quite wealthy as it is. I don't think she'd sell her soul to Wall Street. As for Donald Trump, I fear he doesn't have a soul ... or even a Kia Soul.
4) Any reference to the Bill Clinton presidency should also include his many successes; he was popular when he left office for good reason. Now as for his successor, ... how quick we are to forget how life was under the last Republican administration.
5) Private e-mail system, here I agree with you. She was arrogant and stupid to go with such a system despite advice to the contrary. No excuse. However it seems people forget her predecessors had similar systems that no one wanted to investigate. So instead millions are spent investigating something that was far from criminal but rather an exercise in poor judgement. I might also mention millions of e-mails were deleted, or more charitably "disappeared", from an e-mail server during the Bush years.
6) Benghazi. Well at least spending a fortune on several investigations showed that Clinton acted appropriately. Just a crazy witch hunt, IMHO. And I might remind you far more people were killed in numerous embassy incidents during the Bush years. Oh, and a 200+ marines were killed in Beirut during the Reagan years. I don't seem to recall any exhaustive congressional hearings or witch hunts following those episodes.
7) Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Well I am not one to praise Debbie. I think she is a shrill, overly partisan harpy (a Democratic equivalent of Michelle Bachman with a few more brain cells). But Hillary did not appoint Debbie to the job. No evidence Hillary colluded with Debbie to undermine Bernie Sanders. Yet do I think Debbie would have done something underhanded to shaft Bernie? Quite possibly. But Hillary won fair and square. She garnered far more votes that Bernie, even to the point of not needing super delegates (..I think this super delegate business is awful).
IMHO, Hillary is a very smart woman. She fully grasps the role of POTUS and is fully qualified for the job. Do I *trust* her personally? Meh. But I do think ultimately we'll have an Obama third term. For me this is good enough considering the alternative ...
... and that alternative is a person who is utterly unqualified to be Commander in Chief. On a personal level I find him FAR more repulsive that Hillary; he's just creepy. His views on women, disabled individuals, and minorities are, IMHO, not consistent for those who should be considered as POTUS. Even George W. Bush, whom I think was a dreadful president, had far better character than Trump.
Sorry for going on. I am not going to post further here; I don't think my words will convince any Trump supporter to changes his/her ways. I also find these sorts of exchanges lead to "too much heat and not enough light". I hope what I wrote is viewed more illuminating than incendiary.
_Lazza
Last edited: