Preloader
The M32 Martyr
I'm thinking of ordering the ZZP downpipe with an extra thread-o-let for a future wideband sensor. As you know, the narrowband sensor is only accurate at close to 14.7 AFR, which is basically idle and moderate driving (economy driving).
Under WOT acceleration, when peak hp is desired the AFR hits levels that the narrowband is not sensitive enough to read, and the ECU goes into open-loop and delivers fuel/timing based on pre-prescribed program maps and readings from sensors like temp, TPS and knock.
So even data-logging hard runs isn't capturing very useful data for adjustments to accommodate upgrade mods. While tuners like BNR/Trifecta can tune based on dyno runs with different mods and adjust your tune, accurate AFR readings from real-world WOT (qtr mile runs FTW), could allow you to get REALLY dialed-in.
I'm wondering if a wideband were to be swapped in for the stock narrowband, could the ECU be programmed to still operate as normal, but allow for wideband logging with EZflash?
And if not, could the addition of a wideband sensor while leaving the stock one in place, allow a way to use it's information into the feedback loop without a piggyback?
Under WOT acceleration, when peak hp is desired the AFR hits levels that the narrowband is not sensitive enough to read, and the ECU goes into open-loop and delivers fuel/timing based on pre-prescribed program maps and readings from sensors like temp, TPS and knock.
So even data-logging hard runs isn't capturing very useful data for adjustments to accommodate upgrade mods. While tuners like BNR/Trifecta can tune based on dyno runs with different mods and adjust your tune, accurate AFR readings from real-world WOT (qtr mile runs FTW), could allow you to get REALLY dialed-in.
I'm wondering if a wideband were to be swapped in for the stock narrowband, could the ECU be programmed to still operate as normal, but allow for wideband logging with EZflash?
And if not, could the addition of a wideband sensor while leaving the stock one in place, allow a way to use it's information into the feedback loop without a piggyback?