I wish I could talk to some of the GM engineers at the Tech Center and explain some issues and ideas on the forum, but I am not allowed to talk to the customer while working. I think that some of the GM people need to pay more attention to the forums.
I'm sure, depending on who you talked to you'd get the following response.
- Don't know nuttin about it.
-Can't figure out the cause
-Found the issue but can't get a proper replacement approved.
- Gawd dam bleepedy bleep bleeping bean counters won't bleeping let us fix this bleeping simple problem.
Or
-I can count to potato!
Honestly GM could do wonders for itself in terms of warranty cost and brand loyalty by avoiding "bean counter" decisions like this and the current sway bar links. Known crap designs.
But what do I know. It's probably way more cost effective to save a couple $$$ on the assembly line and eat the countless hours of diag+ labor time and trans replacements (throw sway bar links in there too.
Can't forget the time the engineers spending on tech cases trying to find a repair method or tracking the source of the issue. Oh and ofcourse the potential buyers that are scared off from these potential issues and buyers that will not return to GM because of a failure to remedy the issue
clears throat: Klystron).
Maybe It's just me.
BTW if the source of the issue was a $10 part and 100,000 M32s were shipped it would only take 1,334 trans replacements for GM to break even on specing a better part. In otherwords if only 1.3% of the trans had issues requiring replacement GM would come out ahead dollar wise. That's assuming a trans replacement cost GM $750 for parts and labor. If your including loaner cost, case technician involvement, and field engineer time then $750 looks really, really conservative for trans replacement cost; and completely disregarding future purchases that may be associated with such an issue